[Your shopping cart is empty

News

Iron ore price negotiations - Indian iron ore tax hike favors miners – 04 Jan 10

Reuters reported that India's 5% iron ore export tax hike may further tempt Chinese buyers back into a loveless annual relationship with the big three miners, in preference to the uncertain supply and volatile prices of the spot market.

As per report, smarting after losing the battle to win bigger cuts in 2009 contracts than Asian rivals, China will now face even more pressure to accede to miners' demand for a hefty increase in 2010 contract prices, as spot prices rise to record levels and output in the world's top steel producer continues to surge.

Analysts have been steadily upping their forecasts for a rise in settlements between Chinese mills and miners BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto and Vale to around 20% but there are already indications that an eventual settlement may be higher.

Mr Cameron Hunt director of the Metal Bulletin Iron Ore Index in London said that "Our figures show that market tightness will actually increase over the next two years, particularly for seaborne material, so an early resolution to the benchmark prices will be an advantage to iron ore buyers."
According to Chinese consultancy Mysteel, the news helped lift the Steel Index's iron ore benchmark to a lifetime high of USD 112.10 per tonnes, while deals for 63.5% Indian fines in China were done at a record USD 119 per tonne to USD 121 per tonne. This is about 50% higher than contract prices agreed for this year between miners and Japanese and Korean mills.

A trader in Shanghai said that "The impact is massive and it is affecting prices in the whole industry. The Indians will have their cake and eat it because they can pass the costs entirely onto Chinese customers."
India, which supplies nearly a fifth of China's iron ore imports, lifted the duty on iron ore fines to 5% from zero, while iron ore lumps faced 10% duty from December 24th 2009 up from 5%.

Jan 4, 2010 08:05
Number of visit : 387

Comments

Sender name is required
Email is required
Characters left: 500
Comment is required